Recently, I have
been listening to a lot of podcasts. Most recently, an episode of This American Life grappled with the
issue of loneliness, starting at a cosmic level. Given that I listen to
podcasts principally out of a kind of loneliness (living and working in a
non-English speak environment), it was amusingly apposite. In a very short
time, however, my amusement gave way to a feeling of existential dread.
The programme
bore the title “Fermi’s Paradox”, and used the conundrum of cosmic loneliness
to springboard into the more general topic of loneliness. For the uninitiated,
Fermi’s paradox is the contradiction presented by the apparent likelihood of
intelligent life existing in our Galaxy and the complete lack of visible
evidence that this is the case. In Fermi’s words, “Where are they?” (“they”
being technologically advanced aliens).
For the show’s
producer, David Kestenbaum, the possibility that humans are alone in the
visible universe made him feel profoundly sad. I do not share this feeling:
perhaps when there are fewer things to feel sad about within human civilisation
I will start to grow melancholy at the silent universe. I did allow myself to
consider Fermi’s paradox yet again, however, and this led me to a darker place.
The predominant
hypothesis concerning the apparent absence of intelligent life is quite simple:
there are no aliens. The Rare Earth Hypothesis
states that the conditions necessary to create life, even in its most simple
form, are exceptional. Technologically sophisticated, culturally complex
civilisations such as humanity are therefore beyond an oddity: the evolutionary
coincidences that have led to our development amount to probabilities of
trillions-to-one, we are alone in the Universe. This was what rendered
Kestenbaum so upset. The universe, within which our tiny planet is barely a
pinprick, is teeming with death: it is a cold, desolate, empty expanse, which
will ultimately consume all human endeavour.
The show was a
journey of reconciliation- allowing Kestenbaum to come to terms with his
feelings of cosmic isolation. Part of this process seemed to focus on gently
mocking his sensitivity, and allowing him to recognise that there are far more
pressing things to worry about in the world. Additionally, other
reasons for the Great Silence were touched upon, suggesting that Fermi’s
Paradox need not preclude the existence of alien life.
One of the
reasons explored was the so-called “Zoo Hypothesis”: the existence of alien
civilisations is being deliberately kept from us so that our cultural and
biological evolution can follow its own course, without external influence,
presumably for similar reasons to those of conservationists preserving
endangered species in their natural habitat. It was a thought I’d had before,
but had not pondered for some time… least not since the Simulation
Hypothesis had been re-popularised by Elon Musk.
It was putting these two ideas together that sent me into my own existential
tailspin.
An extension of
the Zoo Hypothesis posits that in their efforts to conceal the rest of the
universe from us humans, the advanced alien civilisation(s) have somehow
isolated our world and its immediate astral environs, surrounding them with an
incredibly sophisticated simulation of the rest of the universe, which has been
created bereft of other sentient beings. For me, Fermi’s paradox naturally
dovetails into the Simulation Hypothesis: our entire reality is a digital
simulation that has been created to observe how a human civilisation might
develop in a universe lacking any other sentient beings.
Imagine those
early pioneers of agriculture, trading the uncertainty of the foraging
lifestyle for the relative security of sedentary life. These men and women ultimately
set in motion an unprecedented revolution in culture and technology,
culminating after tens of thousands of years in the exploration of space.
Along the way
they have created hierarchy, religion and war. To facilitate their industrious
exploitation of their planet’s resources, they have poisoned their own
environment against them. Whilst they have made progress in reversing the inequality
that has sprung up over the centuries of cultural evolution, it is unclear as
to whether this progress is sustainable given the scale of the environmental problems
and capacity to annihilate themselves over political disagreements.
Cue intervention
by an interstellar civilisation. Detecting the emergence of a technologically
advanced civilisation within range of their spacecraft, said civilisation
decide to introduce themselves. They are dismayed to find that Homo sapiens has
been unable to resolve its social differences in spite of its huge leaps forward
technologically. They issue dire warnings to the terrified denizens of earth,
having witnessed this behaviour in previous civilisations. Almost universally,
world leaders surrender to the superior beings and follow their recommendations,
in order to steer humanity from its path to destruction. Not all of earth’s
citizens are so eager to comply, resulting in a bloody war.
Reluctantly, the
aliens assist earth’s leaders in the suppression of the global insurrection,
but in doing so they reinforce support for the rebel forces. The whole planet
is in the throes of a bitter, bloody civil war. The aliens have failed utterly,
and after much discussion, decide that their only option is to intercede
directly: follow our road map to peace and prosperity, or face annihilation-
annihilation at their hands.
The threat is enough
to at least get the leaders of the significant parties to agree to meet. The
dividing line is clear and stark. On the one hand, the establishment opinion
holds that humanity will be destroyed unless the aliens’ instructions are
followed. On the other hand, insurrectionists argue that it was the aliens who
created this situation in the first place, are now threatening the earth
directly, and better to die fighting for freedom than to continue living with
no control over their fate.
The divisions
and arguments are predictable, but the alien civilisation is able to steer a
way through the debate with their trump card: simulated realities. They have
the power to create incredibly accurate hologrammatic simulations, and are
capable of demonstrating the outcome of actions on a galactic scale by tweaking
the simulation’s parameters. Hundreds of these simulations are run, each
demonstrating that if humanity was simply left to their own devices, the only
possible outcome is increased misery and suffering and ultimately, the
extermination of all biological life.
Naturally, the
insurrectionists suggest that these computer models are weighted in favour of
the extra-terrestrials preferred outcome. As a measure of good faith, the
aliens induct the top computer scientists and programmers from the
insurrectionist side into the inner workings of simulation construction. Across
earth, an uneasy truce reigns.
After several
years, the insurrectionists are convinced by the civilisations validity, but
this does not put an end to the conflict. The debate turns to the age-old issue
of individual agency and the greater good, the Platonic/Aristotelian dialectic
that has plagued public discourse since the dawn of civilisation. However,
faced with annihilation, the wider populace overwhelmingly choose life as well-fed slaves than hungry free men. A new world government begins to institute the
aliens’ original programme for cultural and environmental recovery.
Naturally,
pockets of resistance still exist across all continents. Though they can no
longer count on the same levels of popular support as before, they are still
able to interrupt the recovery programme and cause misery, pain and suffering. For
some, this is the price of progress, and anticipate the remaining
insurrectionists slowly dying out. For others, it is unnecessary and hideous,
and are dismayed by the establishment’s inability to stamp it out completely.
Once again, the
aliens manage to steer a path through the fog. Human leaders are urged to reach
out to the remaining extremists and offer amnesty: not in return for ceasing their actions, but for the opportunity to negotiate and discuss once again. The
aliens are desperate to understand the desires and motives of these men and
women, and to do what they can to end what they see as unnecessary suffering.
Amongst the myriad demands and aspirations lurked something curious: it wasn’t
that the insurrectionists wanted the aliens to just go away, they wanted them
never to have arrived.
So: in order to
demonstrate at least some degree of compliance, the aliens agreed to run a
simulation in which they never came to earth. In fact, they agreed to run a
simulation of the universe entirely devoid of other sentient life forms. They
hoped this would demonstrate the hopelessness of the remaining insurrectionists’
cause. I cannot speculate on the outcome, because I believe that this is the simulation
in which we now live.
I snapped out of my reverie in a manner similar to Dhasa in the Glass Bead Game: I found myself back in the present, doing something completely mundane, having lived through not just one life time but tens of thousands of years of parallel history. Like Dhasa I was by water, pouring from a shower head not a gently babbling forest stream. My heart rate felt higher than usual and I was aware of a great deal of chatter in my head. I resolved to practice some mindfulness, in an effort to return myself to normality.
I snapped out of my reverie in a manner similar to Dhasa in the Glass Bead Game: I found myself back in the present, doing something completely mundane, having lived through not just one life time but tens of thousands of years of parallel history. Like Dhasa I was by water, pouring from a shower head not a gently babbling forest stream. My heart rate felt higher than usual and I was aware of a great deal of chatter in my head. I resolved to practice some mindfulness, in an effort to return myself to normality.
Inhale, exhale: as long as you are breathing, there’s more
right with you than wrong with you.
I felt the cold,
wet torrent immerse my head and body.
I looked at the
soap bubbles forming between my fingers.
I observed the
complexity of the iridescence on the surface of each bubble, each one,
containing within it its own universe.
What kind of
technology would simulate this? Even at a level observable by the human senses,
what power would be required to simulate something so complex, so convincingly?
It looks so
real. It feels so real.
But then again,
it’s all we’ve ever known. How do we know that this is what wetness feels like?
Embrace the
matrix. There is no way out.
You can listen
to the podcast that inspired my melancholy here.
No comments:
Post a Comment